I was having lunch in the synagogue social hall after services and sat down with a woman and her son, who is doing graduate work in biochemistry. I noticed that the woman had taken food only from the gluten-free table. “Are you a celiac?” I asked. “No,” her son answered for her, “She’s a crackpot.” She gave him a dirty look. She explained that she had read the best-selling book Wheat Belly by Dr. William Davis, and it had convinced her that she had an allergy to wheat. “I feel so much better now that I’ve gone gluten-free,” she said. Her son rolled his eyes.
The gluten-free fad is one more sign that we live at a time when clever marketing based on pseudoscience trumps evidence, no pun intended… well… maybe intended just a bit. Any use of the word “trump’ is now under suspicion of being an oblique reference to the president-elect. Disputes have arisen in bridge clubs over no-trump bids being made in a sarcastic tone of voice. I actually chose the verb “trump” in that sentence because I can’t help wondering whether there isn’t a connection between the general gullibility that clever marketing exploits and the election of Donald Trump.
Common wisdom has it that Trump represents a working-class backlash against elites. Trump invents his own facts, and the uneducated working-class masses buy his lies. But facts, evidence and basic scientific expertise don’t play a big role in the cherished beliefs of so-called elites either.
We are appalled at the scientific illiteracy of uneducated Trump supporters who cheer his contention that global warming is a hoax concocted by the Chinese. But what about the scientific illiteracy of those educated environmentalists who buy Vandana Shiva’s contention Golden Rice is a hoax? Golden Rice is rice that has been genetically modified to contain a sufficient quantity of vitamin A to save millions for whom rice is a dietary staple from going blind. The safety of GMOs enjoys a greater scientific consensus than the scientific consensus on global warming, but the anti-GMO followers of Shiva ignore the scientific evidence.
It isn’t uneducated white men who have made crackpot alternative medicine from acupuncture to homeopathy a $34 billion-dollar-a-year industry. It has been suggested by no less a luminary than historian Timothy Snyder that the success of Russian propaganda in spreading disinformation is linked to the postmodernist skepticism about objective truth that has been embraced by so many western academics.
So if we are entering a post-fact world where the winning candidate is the one who tells so many lies that the fact checkers can’t keep up, maybe it’s because our entire culture isn’t sure what a lie is anymore.
6 thoughts on “Trump’s Post-Fact America”
The woman “feels so much better” after going gluten free …. If so, who are we to argue?
I know, I know, “it’s just a placebo affect” I hear you think … (Yes, I really can hear you think!). Most people tend to belittle the placebo effect, but think about it …. just for a moment. If you feel better following any treatment, no matter how unproven, what’s the matter with that? You feel better, and that’s the purpose of medicine sensu lato n’est ce pas? (Having thrown in some Latin I couldn’t resist throwing in some French too!)
Evidence-based medicine controls for the placebo effect among other things, and that’s great …. obviously. But the placebo effect is a genuine effect, and when it works, don’t knock it!
Well, maybe Trump will have a placebo effect.
Actually, Reuben, I think there is a Trump placebo effect. He can’t bring back manufacturing jobs any more than a homeopathic remedy can cure an illness, but the workers who have been left behind by globalization will feel much better, at least for a while, just because he gave voice to their anger and despair, and by getting him elected, they feel empowered.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My comment related to the woman story only, forgetting that it was a foil for Trump …. Duh!
Leaving Trump aside, I don’t think we should pooh-pooh the placebo effect (though I applaud anyone who would pooh on Trump!).
If by pooh-pooh the placebo effect, you mean deny its existence, I agree. But we don’t want to promote alternative remedies that don’t offer anything more than a placebo effect, at least not for serious ailments. The placebo effect relies on ignorance. Echinacea seemed to stave off head colds for me until I read the results of a double-blind study that showed it had no effect on head colds at all. Suddenly it stopped working.
Reply to your last sentence: “Exactly”! …. When a physiotherapist offered me a brief acupuncture as part of a treatment, I asked: “Am I paying extra for it?” … The answer was “no”. Why did I agree to it? To demonstrate exactly what you say at the end …. if one is medically literate, there is no longer a placebo effect.
By pooh-pooh, I meant the opposite of “deny its existence” – – I meant don’t pooh-pooh the benefit. It exists, and therefore by definition it “works” – – at least for medically illiterate folks. Why deny them that relief? Of course this does not refer to serious illness. And no, I’m not “promoting” it in any way. I say simply, don’t negate the fact that some people feel better after it, so don’t deny them that relief. I imagine that echinacea is harmless ?? In which case, nothing to lose.